THE REAL POLITIK ISSUE: VOLUME 13, ISSUE 25
WAR: I WISH I KNEW HOW TO QUIT YOU!
by Malik Isasis
On June 5, 2008 Bush stated, "[It's] very important for the world to take the Iranian threat seriously, which the United States does," Bush said. "Iran is an existential threat to peace." Bush, Olmert and their neocons have been pushing war with Iran since the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003.
“Iran is an existential threat to peace,” Bush said.
No motherfucker, you are the existential threat to peace.
I’ve spent two days pouring over a disturbing report (download report) of how the United States plans to take out Iran nuclear facilities. “Considering a War with Iran: A Discussion Paper on WMD in the Middle East”, report substantiated my theory of Iraq as a staging ground for a much larger colonization effort of Arab and Muslim states in the Middle East by the United States and Israel.
The necons dusted off their corporate colonization plans immediately after September 11, 2001 and decided that the time is now to exert American power and influence by completely destabilizing the whole of the Middle East, the so-called War on Terror is the distraction, the purpose of a colonization is so that the corporate raiders could come in and rape and pillage the natural resources. The spoils of war and destruction will be divided amongst three countries: the United States, Great Britain and Israel.
Building Nobility in Mass Murder
In order to build nobility in mass murder, Bush and the American and Israeli neocons must first demonize, dehumanize, and caricaturize Arabs and Muslims as savages so that when they drop 250,000 heavy weight bombs over Baghdad it is seen as a great cause.
Excerpts from Plesch’s and Butcher’s paper clearly illustrates Bush’s noble intentions:
General Wesley Clark claims [sic] that he became aware of the Bush Administration’s instructions concerning the overthrow of the Iranian regime in September 2001. He states that he was told this in the Pentagon by a serving General holding the order in his hand.
“He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, “I just got this down from upstairs” meaning the Secretary of Defense’s office -- “today.” And he said, “This that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.”
In various forms, regime change or change of orientation favouring the US occurred in Iraq, Lebanon, Libya and Somalia in the ensuing six years. (pp. 6)
The Israeli-Lebanese War two summers ago brought to light, Lebanon as a blueprint for an attack on Iran just as Seymour Hersh reported in August 2006. Israel wasn't successful in the military campaign; however, the US will still use the blueprint.
Although the war was a stalemate, the Bush administration and the Likudniks in Israel were still successful in their prime objective and that is destabilizing the Lebanese government.
In Bush fashion and in his usual disconnectedness, his administration had the audacity to condemn Hezbollah and its allies in the UN for attempts to destabilize the Lebanese government. But in the spring of 2007, Bush escalated tensions throughout the Middle East by arming militias throughout Lebanon, Gaza and Iraq causing disruption, death and destruction which has led to destabilization of governments and not to mention, the US inability to track the arms in which it sold or gave to militias. As I suspected before, the targeted countries are being set up to fail, but so are the military, but none of this matter in Bush's World, his eyes are on the prize and not on common sense.
This is why Bush and Co. aren’t interested in diplomacy. Talking to these countries just might yeiled peace, so why take that chance?
WASHINGTON, Nov 13, 2006 (Reuters) - President George W. Bush, searching for a new approach in Iraq, expressed little enthusiasm on Monday for seeking Syrian and Iranian help to calm Iraq as he cautioned Democrats against quick U.S. troop reductions.
The lack of diplomacy surely makes sense now doesn't it? Speaking of diplomacy or the lack thereof, has the State Department disappeared Condeleezza Rice? Where are the diplomatic efforts on the part of the State Department? Isn't it peculiar that she is nowhere in sight in the looming conflict with Iran?
Presidential Politics and the New War
It is believed that the Democratic Party in the coming elections will slaughter the Banana Republicans. Bush will try and bequeath his ailing bastards with a new war, hoping to prey on the fear that has gotten him eights years of raping and pillaging of the U.S. treasury.
The Republican Party has opened the windows from their dark lair and commanded the flying monkeys to do whatever it takes to win the next elections for the Republicans and their conservative cabal. The neocon political mercenaries fly high over the masses dropping shit-bombs to divert attention away from the inept handling of the Iraq occupation by picking on Iran. The American public appears wide-awake and is not being fooled by the trickery. Baghdad is covered in blood and destruction and the American public has taken notice. After Hurricane Katrina, America saw the Bush Administration for who they really are…frauds. It’s like they create crises, in order to pretend to be doing something about them. The Bush Administration’s and the neocons’ one-act play has run its course and they look oxymoronic, with more emphases placed on moronic as they recite tired and hacked slogans to produce fear.
They’ve tapped the well of fear too often, leaving Americans fear-fatigued and skeptical of the false prophets of Capitalism and their Gears of War and Destruction. The level of fear that was created by Bush and Co. after September 11, 2001 and through two wars and now two occupations was not sustainable, but the Republicans are still in the trenches with forked tongues searching for fresh fear to be tapped.
Make no doubt about it, John McCain will continue this policy.
The Cause for the War on Terror
Since 1971 the world’s oil supply has been traded in U.S. dollars making the dollar the dominant reserve currency forcing countries who pay for energy and International Monetary Fund debt to use the dollar. Saddam Hussein was the first of the OPEC nations to start selling oil in euros, upsetting the U.S. monopoly. We all know what happened to Saddam. He became a casualty of ‘The War on Terror’. Syria, Iran has threatened to use euros as the reserve currency for buying oil. They are both being threatened by the United States and its proxy, Israel. Venezuela has threatened to use euros, and has even bartered around the dollar by trading with developing countries in energy for goods and services. As a result of President Chavez's disdain toward US policy, an attempt coup d’etat in 2002 by the Bush administration, failed.
"All of this is bad news for the US economy and the dollar. The fear for Washington will be that not only will the future price of oil not be right, but the currency might not be right either. Which perhaps helps explain why the US is increasingly turning to its second major tool for dominating world affairs: military force."
Bush has no sense of boundaries and will break the military by involving it in its attempt to occupy and subjugate the whole of the Middle East for the energy needs and the preservation of U.S. dominance.
Bush and his corporate pirates are acting like cornered cats lashing out, using all the blunt force of the government to maintain power over others. But power is only maintained because others are complicit to it. The world is no longer complicit to the United States and its indiscretions.
George Bush and his enablers have overplayed their hand. As we fall from grace and off the shelf of superpower, maybe it will humble us as it did European countries who’ve watched the sun set on their ability to project power, and now they are sitting back on the beach with Pena Colidas, enjoying the schadenfreude and the sun setting on America.
Cheers.
WAR: I WISH I KNEW HOW TO QUIT YOU!
by Malik Isasis
On June 5, 2008 Bush stated, "[It's] very important for the world to take the Iranian threat seriously, which the United States does," Bush said. "Iran is an existential threat to peace." Bush, Olmert and their neocons have been pushing war with Iran since the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003.
“Iran is an existential threat to peace,” Bush said.
No motherfucker, you are the existential threat to peace.
I’ve spent two days pouring over a disturbing report (download report) of how the United States plans to take out Iran nuclear facilities. “Considering a War with Iran: A Discussion Paper on WMD in the Middle East”, report substantiated my theory of Iraq as a staging ground for a much larger colonization effort of Arab and Muslim states in the Middle East by the United States and Israel.
The necons dusted off their corporate colonization plans immediately after September 11, 2001 and decided that the time is now to exert American power and influence by completely destabilizing the whole of the Middle East, the so-called War on Terror is the distraction, the purpose of a colonization is so that the corporate raiders could come in and rape and pillage the natural resources. The spoils of war and destruction will be divided amongst three countries: the United States, Great Britain and Israel.
Building Nobility in Mass Murder
In order to build nobility in mass murder, Bush and the American and Israeli neocons must first demonize, dehumanize, and caricaturize Arabs and Muslims as savages so that when they drop 250,000 heavy weight bombs over Baghdad it is seen as a great cause.
Excerpts from Plesch’s and Butcher’s paper clearly illustrates Bush’s noble intentions:
General Wesley Clark claims [sic] that he became aware of the Bush Administration’s instructions concerning the overthrow of the Iranian regime in September 2001. He states that he was told this in the Pentagon by a serving General holding the order in his hand.
“He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, “I just got this down from upstairs” meaning the Secretary of Defense’s office -- “today.” And he said, “This that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.”
In various forms, regime change or change of orientation favouring the US occurred in Iraq, Lebanon, Libya and Somalia in the ensuing six years. (pp. 6)
The Israeli-Lebanese War two summers ago brought to light, Lebanon as a blueprint for an attack on Iran just as Seymour Hersh reported in August 2006. Israel wasn't successful in the military campaign; however, the US will still use the blueprint.
Although the war was a stalemate, the Bush administration and the Likudniks in Israel were still successful in their prime objective and that is destabilizing the Lebanese government.
In Bush fashion and in his usual disconnectedness, his administration had the audacity to condemn Hezbollah and its allies in the UN for attempts to destabilize the Lebanese government. But in the spring of 2007, Bush escalated tensions throughout the Middle East by arming militias throughout Lebanon, Gaza and Iraq causing disruption, death and destruction which has led to destabilization of governments and not to mention, the US inability to track the arms in which it sold or gave to militias. As I suspected before, the targeted countries are being set up to fail, but so are the military, but none of this matter in Bush's World, his eyes are on the prize and not on common sense.
This is why Bush and Co. aren’t interested in diplomacy. Talking to these countries just might yeiled peace, so why take that chance?
WASHINGTON, Nov 13, 2006 (Reuters) - President George W. Bush, searching for a new approach in Iraq, expressed little enthusiasm on Monday for seeking Syrian and Iranian help to calm Iraq as he cautioned Democrats against quick U.S. troop reductions.
The lack of diplomacy surely makes sense now doesn't it? Speaking of diplomacy or the lack thereof, has the State Department disappeared Condeleezza Rice? Where are the diplomatic efforts on the part of the State Department? Isn't it peculiar that she is nowhere in sight in the looming conflict with Iran?
Presidential Politics and the New War
It is believed that the Democratic Party in the coming elections will slaughter the Banana Republicans. Bush will try and bequeath his ailing bastards with a new war, hoping to prey on the fear that has gotten him eights years of raping and pillaging of the U.S. treasury.
The Republican Party has opened the windows from their dark lair and commanded the flying monkeys to do whatever it takes to win the next elections for the Republicans and their conservative cabal. The neocon political mercenaries fly high over the masses dropping shit-bombs to divert attention away from the inept handling of the Iraq occupation by picking on Iran. The American public appears wide-awake and is not being fooled by the trickery. Baghdad is covered in blood and destruction and the American public has taken notice. After Hurricane Katrina, America saw the Bush Administration for who they really are…frauds. It’s like they create crises, in order to pretend to be doing something about them. The Bush Administration’s and the neocons’ one-act play has run its course and they look oxymoronic, with more emphases placed on moronic as they recite tired and hacked slogans to produce fear.
They’ve tapped the well of fear too often, leaving Americans fear-fatigued and skeptical of the false prophets of Capitalism and their Gears of War and Destruction. The level of fear that was created by Bush and Co. after September 11, 2001 and through two wars and now two occupations was not sustainable, but the Republicans are still in the trenches with forked tongues searching for fresh fear to be tapped.
Make no doubt about it, John McCain will continue this policy.
The Cause for the War on Terror
Since 1971 the world’s oil supply has been traded in U.S. dollars making the dollar the dominant reserve currency forcing countries who pay for energy and International Monetary Fund debt to use the dollar. Saddam Hussein was the first of the OPEC nations to start selling oil in euros, upsetting the U.S. monopoly. We all know what happened to Saddam. He became a casualty of ‘The War on Terror’. Syria, Iran has threatened to use euros as the reserve currency for buying oil. They are both being threatened by the United States and its proxy, Israel. Venezuela has threatened to use euros, and has even bartered around the dollar by trading with developing countries in energy for goods and services. As a result of President Chavez's disdain toward US policy, an attempt coup d’etat in 2002 by the Bush administration, failed.
"All of this is bad news for the US economy and the dollar. The fear for Washington will be that not only will the future price of oil not be right, but the currency might not be right either. Which perhaps helps explain why the US is increasingly turning to its second major tool for dominating world affairs: military force."
Bush has no sense of boundaries and will break the military by involving it in its attempt to occupy and subjugate the whole of the Middle East for the energy needs and the preservation of U.S. dominance.
Bush and his corporate pirates are acting like cornered cats lashing out, using all the blunt force of the government to maintain power over others. But power is only maintained because others are complicit to it. The world is no longer complicit to the United States and its indiscretions.
George Bush and his enablers have overplayed their hand. As we fall from grace and off the shelf of superpower, maybe it will humble us as it did European countries who’ve watched the sun set on their ability to project power, and now they are sitting back on the beach with Pena Colidas, enjoying the schadenfreude and the sun setting on America.
Cheers.
posted by Malik Isasis at
2:48 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home