SEX AND THE CITY
by Malik Isasis
I’m freshly on the mend from a broken heart. So, I decided that I would relocate to New York City and start anew. Since I am newly single, and have reached my creative ceiling here in Seattle as a filmmaker, I wanted to take the opportunity to take a bite out of the Big Apple. A close friend told me about a National Geographic article on singles in the United States that blew my mind and apparently, his.
He said that Seattle had an excess of 40, 000 men and that the New York City metropolitan area had an access of 185,000 women. “I have a feeling you’re going to be okay out there.” He said, “It’s me that I’m worried about.” He finished.
If you take a look at the National Geographic map, you will see that the entire west coast of the United States has an excess of hundreds of thousands of men. Los Angeles, like Seattle has an excess of 40,000 men; San Francisco/Oakland areas has a combined excess of 90,000 men, while Chicago has an excess of 40,000 women; Boston, Baltimore, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, Miami, Memphis, and New Orleans—all have an excess of women by 40,000.
If you are an upwardly mobile single woman, you are more likely to find more men west of the Mississippi river, and an upwardly mobile single man is more likely to find more women east of the Mississippi.
An Unscientific Poll
It always felt very difficult dating in Seattle; I always thought of the people—women in particular as very aloof. The reality is that women in Seattle have more choices.
My friend and I sat at our regular café in the trendy neighborhood of Capitol Hill. When I told him about the National Geographic map, he wasn’t surprised. We looked around the café—there were only two women and the rest of the patrons in the café were men. There were 12 of us, including the café staff.
For shits and giggles J. and I decided to count the men and women who walked past the café. Over the next ten minutes we counted 60 males and 28 females who walked by. Approximately, 2-to-1 ratio of men to women.
Good for women, bad for men.
I Heart New York
As I transition from Seattle to New York City, I see new possibilities. Thanks National Geographic.
9/11 Life Worth $1.8 million; Iraqi Life, $2,000. What Does It Mean?
by Tom Engelhardt,Tom's Dispatch
Using publicly available numbers, one can calculate that the U.S. government values an innocent civilian slaughtered by al-Qaeda terrorists on September 11, 2001 at $1.8 million, and an Iraqi civilian killed by Marines at $2,000.
What value has a human life?
We usually think of this in terms of sentiment -- of memories, grief, love, longing, of everything, in short, that is too deep and valuable to put a price upon. Then again, is anything in our world truly priceless?
As anyone who has ever taken out a life insurance policy knows, we humans are quite capable of putting a price on life -- and death. In her book Pricing the Priceless Child, Viviana Zelizer reminds us that, starting in the 1870s in the U.S., in that era before child labor laws, the business of insuring working-class children, who were then quite valuable to poor families, achieved enormous success. For a few pennies a week, ten dollars in all, you could, for instance, insure your one year-old against the future loss to the family of his or her earning power.
The courts weighed in, assessing the literal value of an earning child to a family. In those days, poor urban children died regularly in staggering numbers under horse's hooves, the wheels of street cars, and trains. In an 1893 editorial, the New York Times referred to this as "child slaughter," and juries reacted accordingly. When Ettie Pressman, just seven years old, died under a team of horses in 1893, while crossing New York's Ludlow Street with her nine year-old sister, a court granted her father $1,000 to compensate him for "his daughter's services and earnings." ("Yes," her father testified, with "what I earn and what the children earn used together we have enough. They earn three dollars each week.")
This came to mind recently, thanks to a New York Times report on another kind of "child slaughter" -- in this case by U.S. Marines, who, in early March, went on a killing rampage near Jalalabad in Afghanistan. Sorry, in Pentagon parlance, this is referred to as "using excessive force." A platoon of elite Marine Special Operations troops in a convoy of Humvees were ambushed by a suicide bomber in a mini-van and one of them was wounded. Initially, it was reported that as "many as 10 people were killed and 34 wounded as the convoy made a frenzied escape, and injured Afghans said the Americans fired on civilian cars and pedestrians as they sped away." The Americans quickly blamed some of these casualties on "militant gunfire." ("Lt. Col. David Accetta, the top U.S. military spokesman in Afghanistan, said gunmen may have fired on U.S. forces at multiple points during the escape.")
Later, it was admitted that the Marines had wielded that "excessive force" remarkably excessively and long after the ambush had ended, laying down a deadly field of fire at six spots, at least, along a ten-mile stretch of road. Their targets, according to a draft report of the U.S. military investigation of the incident (which the Washington Post got its hands on) were Afghans, on foot and in vehicles who were "exclusively civilian in nature" and had engaged in "no kind of provocative or threatening behavior."
In the process, the Marines were reported to have murdered "12 people -- including a 4-year-old girl, a 1-year-old boy and three elderly villagers" -- and wounded 34. According to a report by Carlotta Gall of the New York Times, a "16-year-old newly married girl was cut down while she was carrying a bundle of grass to her family's farmhouse.... A 75-year-old man walking to his shop was hit by so many bullets that his son did not recognize the body when he came to the scene." (U.S. troops at the time took the camera of an Afghan Associated Press photographer who happened to come upon the scene and "deleted" photographs from it, including ones "of a four-wheel drive vehicle where three Afghans had been shot to death inside.")...read on.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home